Mail by Stephen Perkins (Madison, Wisconsin, USA)
Stephen Perkins using the moniker Janet Janet was a central figure in the great mail art surge of the 1980s. Those who participated or have studied correspondence and zines from that era are likely to recognize the Janet Janet persona even if they are not familiar with Perkins, who also has a distinguished career in the above-ground art world.
Janet Janet was headquartered in San Francisco. Today Stephen Perkins resides in Madison, Wisconsin, USA and mails packages that show us how mail art was and always should be done. So Tenderfoots take note and learn at the feet of one of the great masters!
I’m thrilled to have received this stack of 35 cards from Stephen Perkins. They suggest classic Fluxus event scores but are also perfect for communication in the digital age. In this package, Perkins is at his distinctive, conceptual best AND ideologically joining “The Resistance.” Mail art has always had a political aspect; it certainly did in the 80s. Protesting Ronald Reagan and South Africa were particularly prevalent.
Before this post I never thought in terms of something being Perkinsesque (or Janetesque?), but he actually does have a minimalist, text-oriented style that is recognizable.
Stephen Perkins was deeply involved in 1980s zine culture (that was inseparable from mail art) and edited two legendary zines: Box of Water and Schism. He participated in Neoism (especially the British variety led by Stewart Home), the international Art Strike and the plagiarism movement (long before Kenneth Goldsmith) that culminated in the 1989 Festival of Plagiarism in the UK. Perkins has also contributed to scholarship and theory on these subjects. For instance, he and Lloyd Dunn (Photostatic – another classic zine) have published a study of copy art. Perkins is an interesting figure to explore. Ruud Janssen’s interview is good place to begin:
Mail art by Stephen Perkins
The cards are in pairs so that I am able to show both sides (left to right). I am most fascinated with the tautologies, repetitions and binary oppositions created. The repetitions use the same principle as the Janet Janet construct and are a trope of classic conceptualism. A political message is intended which I doubt anyone can fail to read, but Perkins’ conceptual brilliance (and apolitical abstraction) is present everywhere as well.
Deepest thanks to Stephen Perkins!